If conflicts exist between restoration plans and neighbors, the conflicts shall be resolved within 30 calendar days.

• A. 30 calendar days
• B. 15 calendar days
• C. 45 calendar days
• D. 60 calendar days

Answer: (A)

The key idea is that there is a definite, time-bound requirement to settle any disagreements with neighboring entities about restoration plans. Having a 30-calendar-day window provides a clear deadline that encourages timely discussion, assessment, and agreement, so restoration activities aren’t held up by protracted disputes. Counting calendar days, not business days, ensures the timeline is straightforward and consistent across organizations that operate around the clock. If conflicts were resolved faster, like in a half-month period, discussions might be too rushed to address all safety and operational concerns; if the window were much longer, such as 45 or 60 days, restoration could be unnecessarily delayed, hindering service recovery. The 30-day timeframe thus balances the need for thoughtful coordination with the urgency of restoring reliability, with established escalation paths if resolution isn’t reached within the window.